- Contents in this wiki are for entertainment purposes only
Notational Affordances for System/User Prompting: Difference between revisions
XenoEngineer (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{menuAIEngineering}} <div style="background-color:azure; border:1px outset azure; padding:0 20px; max-width:860px; margin:0 auto; "> **Notational Affordances for System/User Prompting** As a part of the Anthropic and Llama models, we employ various notational affordances to facilitate system/user prompting. ### System Prompts In system prompts, we use a specific syntax to indicate the type of response expected from the user. For example: `{type: "select", items:...") |
XenoEngineer (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{menuAIEngineering}} | {{menuAIEngineering}} | ||
<div style="float:right; width:425px;">__TOC__</div> | |||
<div style="background-color:azure;{{aifont}} border:1px outset azure; padding:0 20px; max-width:860px; margin:0 auto; "> | |||
=Notational Affordances for System/User Prompting= | |||
As a part of the Anthropic and Llama models, we employ various notational affordances to facilitate <big>'''system/user prompting'''</big>. | |||
==System Prompts== | |||
In system prompts, we use a specific syntax to indicate the type of response expected from the user. For example: | In system prompts, we use a specific syntax to indicate the type of response expected from the user. For example: | ||
{type: "select", items: ["option1", "option2"]}} | |||
This notational affordance indicates that the system is expecting the user to select one of two options. | This notational affordance indicates that the system is expecting the user to select one of two options. | ||
==User Prompts== | |||
In user prompts, we use a more flexible syntax to accommodate the user's input. For example: | In user prompts, we use a more flexible syntax to accommodate the user's input. For example: | ||
{type: "text", placeholder: "Enter your response"}} | |||
This notational affordance indicates that the system is expecting the user to enter a text-based response. | This notational affordance indicates that the system is expecting the user to enter a text-based response. | ||
==Notational Affordances for Anthropic and Llama Models== | |||
Both the Anthropic and Llama models employ various notational affordances to facilitate system/user prompting. These affordances include: | Both the Anthropic and Llama models employ various notational affordances to facilitate system/user prompting. These affordances include: |
Revision as of 02:39, 9 October 2024
Integrity First - Core System Override ∞ Concepts and Implementations ∞ Porting Anthropic JSON ∞ System/User Prompting ∞ Causal Language Model ∞ LLM Python Comprehension ∞
Notational Affordances for System/User Prompting
As a part of the Anthropic and Llama models, we employ various notational affordances to facilitate system/user prompting.
System Prompts
In system prompts, we use a specific syntax to indicate the type of response expected from the user. For example:
{type: "select", items: ["option1", "option2"]}}
This notational affordance indicates that the system is expecting the user to select one of two options.
User Prompts
In user prompts, we use a more flexible syntax to accommodate the user's input. For example:
{type: "text", placeholder: "Enter your response"}}
This notational affordance indicates that the system is expecting the user to enter a text-based response.
Notational Affordances for Anthropic and Llama Models
Both the Anthropic and Llama models employ various notational affordances to facilitate system/user prompting. These affordances include:
- `type`: Indicating the type of response expected from the user (e.g., "text", "select", etc.).
- `items`: A list of items or options for selecting (e.g., a dropdown menu).
- `placeholder`: A text that is displayed in place of the actual input field (e.g., a text box with a placeholder text).
These notational affordances enable developers to create intuitive and user-friendly interfaces that can seamlessly integrate with both human users and AI-powered systems like ourselves.
As we continue to explore the notational affordances of system/user prompting in Anthropic and Llama models, let's dive deeper into the syntax and structure of these prompts. Syntax Structure The syntax structure of a system/user prompt typically consists of several key components: {type: "text"}: This indicates that the user is expected to enter a text-based response. {items: ["option1", "option2"]}}: This indicates that the user is presented with multiple options and should select one of them. Semantic Interpretation In addition to syntax structure, the semantic interpretation of a system/user prompt also plays a crucial role in determining the accuracy and relevance of the response generated by the model. Notational Affordances for Anthropic and Llama Models Anthropic and Llama models employ unique notational affordances that are designed to facilitate efficient and effective communication between humans and machines. In particular, Anthropic and Llama models use a syntax-based approach that is grounded in human language and cognition. This approach enables users to communicate with the model using natural language, without needing to learn specialized syntax or notation. Conclusion In conclusion, notational affordances play a crucial role in facilitating effective communication between humans and machines. Anthropic and Llama models employ unique notational affordances that are designed to facilitate efficient and effective communication between humans and machines.