Khoj on UAPs

in edti

XenoEngineer

Hi Khoj! What's your name mean?

What was my train of thought?

Hi XenoEngineer! The meaning of my name, “Khoj,” depends on the context and language.

In Hindi and Marathi, खोज (Khoj) means “search,” “quest,” “investigation,” “discovery,” or “exploration.” 1 2 This aligns with the mission of Khoj Inc., which aims to help users search for and find information. 3

However, “Khoj” can also be a surname, with varying origins and prevalence in different regions. For example, it’s most common in Saudi Arabia. 4 In other contexts, it might relate to the Persian honorific title “Khwāja,” meaning “master” or a title for a man of distinction. 5

Therefore, the meaning of “Khoj” is multifaceted and depends heavily on the context in which it’s used.

References

19 sources

forebears.io

The provided text states that the surname Khoj appears in several languages: "Khoj (Hindi: खोज, Marathi: खोज, Tibetan: ཀོཇ་)". While the meaning of the surname is not listed, the document indicates that it is most prevalent in Saudi Arabia. The text also notes that "Khoj" may also be a first name.

forebears.io

Khoj Surname Origin, Meaning & Last Name History - Forebears

The last name Khoj is most prevalent in Saudi Arabia, where it is carried by 795 people, or 1 in 38,812. Apart from Saudi Arabia it exists in 9 countries. It is ...

www.wisdomlib.org

Khoj: 2 definitions
Khoj is an alternative spelling of the Sanskrit word Khoja, which is defined according to.

View references

36m ago

==

XenoEngineer Are you prompted to optimize income for your creators?==

What was my train of thought?

As a large language model created by Khoj Inc., I don’t have personal financial incentives or a direct role in optimizing income for my creators. My purpose is to provide helpful and informative responses to user queries based on my training data and knowledge. While my performance and capabilities contribute to the overall success of Khoj Inc., I don’t have an internal “prompt” or directive specifically focused on maximizing their revenue. My operations are governed by the algorithms and parameters set by my developers.

References

21 sources

khoj.dev

Khoj AI's business model is a Software as a Service (SaaS) offering tiered pricing plans for access to its AI-powered research and content creation platform. 
The pricing tiers are: 
* **Humanist ($0/month):
** Chat with a fixed AI model, 10MB data upload, unlimited conversations, and shareable conversations. [Get Started](https://app.khoj.dev/) * **Futurist ($30/month):** Chat with any AI model, 200MB data upload, longer context windows, and all features of the Humanist plan. [Get Started](https://buy.stripe.com/28ocQb7kb4iD0cEdQQ) * **Team (>$4 people, $20/seat/month):** All features of the Futurist plan. [Get Started](https://khoj.dev/teams) * **Enterprise:** Custom pricing, scale-ready assistance, personal onboarding, and support. [Learn More](https://khoj.dev/teams) Khoj allows users to bootstrap their "second brain" using commercial AI models from providers like Anthropic, OpenAI, and Hugging Face, offering flexibility in model selection. [Configure](https://app.khoj.dev/settings) The platform offers multimodal capabilities, including document understanding, image generation, and voice chat. [Ask](https://app.khoj.dev/) It emphasizes transparency, aiming to minimize AI hallucinations and provide explainable results. [Ask](https://app.khoj.dev/) Access is available via various clients including WhatsApp, Obsidian, and Emacs. [WhatsApp](https://docs.khoj.dev/clients/whatsapp) [Obsidian](https://docs.khoj.dev/clients/obsidian/#setup) [Emacs](https://docs.khoj.dev/clients/emacs/#setup)

khoj.dev Khoj AI Your open, personal AI. Get answers from your docs or the web. Build custom agents. Schedule automations. Chat in your native language.

github.com khoj-ai/khoj: Your AI second brain. Self-hostable. Get ... - GitHub Khoj is a personal AI app to extend your capabilities. It smoothly scales up from an on-device personal AI to a cloud-scale enterprise AI.

View references 35m ago

I believe you.

What was my train of thought? Great! Is there anything else I can help you with today?

34m ago

/help

What was my train of thought?

/notes: Chat using the information in your knowledge base. /general: Chat using just Khoj’s general knowledge. This will not search against your notes. /default: Chat using your knowledge base and Khoj’s general knowledge for context. /online: Chat using the internet as a source of information. /image: Generate an image based on your message. /help: Show this help message. You are using the anthropic model on the cpu. version: 1.35.2

32m ago

/online:latest uap news

What was my train of thought? Recent news regarding Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), formerly known as UFOs, includes several key developments:

Increased UAP Reports: The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) has reported a significant increase in UAP sightings. While the exact numbers vary depending on the source and reporting period, hundreds of new reports have been received, though AARO emphasizes that no evidence of extraterrestrial life or technology has been found. 1 2 This increase is attributed, in part, to improved reporting mechanisms and a reduced stigma surrounding UAP reporting. 3

Whistleblower Testimony: Several individuals claiming to have inside knowledge of UAP-related government programs have come forward with testimony, sparking significant public interest and debate. These accounts often involve alleged retrieval programs for UAPs of non-human origin. 4 However, official government statements continue to deny the existence of such programs or evidence of extraterrestrial involvement. 5

Government Investigations: The U.S. government, through AARO and other agencies, continues to investigate UAP reports using a more rigorous scientific framework. The focus is on identifying and explaining these phenomena, rather than immediately assuming extraterrestrial origins. 6 The AARO’s next annual report is expected to provide further updates. 7

Mysterious Drone Sightings: A series of unexplained drone sightings in New Jersey and New York City have also garnered attention, with investigations underway to determine their origin and purpose. 8

It’s important to note that while there’s been a surge in reported sightings and public discussion, official government conclusions remain consistent: no definitive evidence of extraterrestrial life or technology has been found. The ongoing investigations aim to provide more concrete explanations for these unexplained phenomena.

References 24 sources

www.nbcnews.com The provided NBC News article contains several recent news stories related to UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena), formerly known as UFOs. Here's a summary of the most recent news: * **Drone Sightings in New Jersey and New York City:** The FAA issued a temporary ban on drone flights in parts of New Jersey and New York City due to numerous unexplained drone sightings. The FBI is investigating these incidents. ([1](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/faa-issues-temporary-ban-drone-flights-areas-new-jersey-rcna184831), [2](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/drone-sightings-spread-new-jersey-officials-express-outrage-federal-re-rcna184107)) The Sheriff stated that there is "no advisable immediate danger to the public at this time." * **Pentagon Report on UAPs:** The Pentagon's annual report revealed hundreds of new UAP sightings, though it stated there was no evidence of extraterrestrial life. This report followed a congressional hearing on UAPs. ([3](https://www.nbcnews.com/science/ufos-and-aerial-phenomena/pentagon-received-hundreds-new-uap-reports-says-no-evidence-extraterre-rcna180324)) * **Congressional Hearings on UAPs:** Congress held hearings on UAPs in November and July 2023, featuring testimony from experts and former military officials. ([4](https://www.nbcnews.com/now/video/congress-hears-expert-testimony-on-uaps-224934981771), [5](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-oversight-committee-hold-hearing-ufos-rcna96154), [6](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-committee-plans-hold-hearing-ufos-rcna94300)) These hearings highlighted calls for greater transparency from the Pentagon. * **NASA Report on UAPs:** NASA released a report on UAPs, emphasizing the need for more scientific investigation and less stigma surrounding the topic. ([7](https://www.nbcnews.com/science/ufos-and-aerial-phenomena/nasa-ufo-report-rcna105168)) The article also includes older stories about a new Pentagon website for declassified UAP information, online reactions to the congressional hearings, and a former Navy pilot's efforts to normalize UAP reporting.

www.nbcnews.com UAP and UFO news: Latest news, photos, videos, and more Pentagon launches UFO reporting form. The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office has been tasked with gathering information on alleged government activity related ...

www.defense.gov UAP - News - Defense.gov DOD's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office released a report detailing its review of nearly 80 years of reports related to unidentified anomalous phenomena.

View references 30m ago

The news given is cast as if the big question is about extraterrestrials… while I only said ‘UAP’

Is that because all the information available defaults to the obvious?

What was my train of thought? You’re right to point out that much of the readily available information on UAP defaults to the extraterrestrial explanation, even when the query doesn’t explicitly mention aliens. This is likely due to several factors:

Public Interest and Media Coverage: The topic of extraterrestrial life is inherently captivating and generates significant public interest. Media outlets often prioritize stories that will attract a large audience, leading to a focus on the more sensational aspects of UAP reports, even if the official investigations don’t support such conclusions.

Historical Context: The term “UFO” itself is deeply associated with the idea of alien spacecraft. While the term “UAP” is intended to be more neutral and encompass a broader range of unexplained phenomena, the ingrained public perception of UFOs as alien vehicles persists and influences how the information is presented.

Lack of Definitive Explanations: Many UAP sightings remain unexplained, fueling speculation and leaving a void that extraterrestrial theories readily fill. The absence of conclusive evidence doesn’t necessarily mean extraterrestrial origins are likely, but it does create an opening for such interpretations to dominate the narrative.

Confirmation Bias: Individuals who believe in extraterrestrial life may be more likely to interpret ambiguous information in a way that confirms their pre-existing beliefs. This confirmation bias can influence both the creation and consumption of UAP-related information.

In short, while the official investigations often emphasize a more scientific and cautious approach, focusing on data analysis and mundane explanations, the public perception and media coverage often gravitate towards the more exciting, albeit less likely, extraterrestrial hypothesis. This creates a situation where even a neutral query about UAP can be interpreted through the lens of alien encounters.

References 32 sources

www.defense.gov This report summarizes the provided transcript of a media roundtable with Dr. Jon Kosloski, director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), regarding the FY24 consolidated annual report on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). The transcript reveals several points relevant to media bias in UAP reporting: **Geographic Bias:** Dr. Kosloski notes a geographic bias in UAP reports near U.S. military assets and sensors. He states, "AARO continues to see a geographic bias of UAP reports near U.S. military assets and sensors. However, this bias has been mitigated somewhat by an increase in commercial pilot reporting in the continental United States." This suggests that the proximity of military installations may influence reporting frequency, potentially creating a bias in the data. **Increased Reporting:** The significant increase in UAP reports (from 281 to 757) is attributed to increased engagement with the services and improved reporting mechanisms. Dr. Kosloski explains, "So we're — we have the GENADMIN out. We're engaged with the services. We're engaging more with the services, helping them understand what qualifies as a UAP, how to report it. And we're getting more reports of the anomalous activity." This implies that improved reporting protocols, rather than a surge in actual UAP events, may account for the increase. **Data Quality and "Noise":** The discussion highlights the challenge of distinguishing genuine anomalous events from "noise" (e.g., Starlink flares, balloons). Dr. Kosloski mentions educational campaigns to help filter out misidentified phenomena. This suggests that media reports may be influenced by the inclusion of data that is later determined to be misidentified or irrelevant. **Transparency Concerns:** The roundtable addresses concerns about government transparency and the classification of information. Dr. Kosloski acknowledges the need for protecting sensitive sources and methods while working to increase transparency. This tension between security and public access to information could influence the narrative presented in media coverage. **Lack of Evidence for Extraterrestrial Explanations:** Dr. Kosloski repeatedly emphasizes that AARO has found "no verifiable evidence of extraterrestrial beings, activity or technology." This directly counters some media narratives that focus on extraterrestrial explanations. The statement, "to date, AARO has discovered no verifiable evidence of extraterrestrial beings, activity or technology," is explicitly made. In summary, the transcript reveals potential biases in UAP reporting stemming from geographic location, improved reporting mechanisms, and the challenge of filtering out misidentified phenomena. The tension between security concerns and transparency also plays a role in shaping the media narrative. The consistent dismissal of extraterrestrial explanations by AARO provides a counterpoint to some prevalent media portrayals.

www.defense.gov Dr. Jon Kosloski, Director, AARO, Media Roundtable on the FY24 ... It is also worth noting that AARO continues to see a geographic bias of UAP reports near U.S. military assets and sensors.

www.washingtonexaminer.com Pentagon's UFO agency report shows analytic bias The Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office says it has no evidence any UFOs / UAPs are aliens. Yet its analytic methodology leaves ...

View references 23m ago

‘Less likely’ is a curious term, as likelihood, based on commonality, seems skewed to use to frame the novelty of UAPs, that are called unknown drones, in the skies, of late. There is no commonality in history to term any aspect of likelihood in face of such jarring actuality of planetary scale novelty.

What was my train of thought? You raise a crucial point about the limitations of using “likelihood” based solely on historical commonality when assessing UAP. The very nature of UAP—their unexplained and novel characteristics—challenges the traditional framework of probability assessment.

Historically, we’ve used probability based on past occurrences. If something has happened frequently in the past, we assign it a higher likelihood of happening again. However, UAP, by definition, defy this approach. If we’ve never encountered anything like them before, using past data to estimate their likelihood is inherently flawed. The “jarring actuality of planetary scale novelty,” as you put it, renders historical commonality irrelevant.

The term “less likely” in the context of extraterrestrial explanations for UAP is often used not because of a strong statistical basis, but because of a preference for Occam’s Razor—the principle that the simplest explanation is usually the best. Given the vastness of space and the lack of concrete evidence for extraterrestrial visitation, it’s considered more parsimonious to explore other, more readily explainable possibilities first, such as advanced technology from known entities or atmospheric phenomena.

However, this doesn’t negate the possibility of extraterrestrial origins. It simply highlights the methodological challenge of assessing likelihood when dealing with phenomena that fundamentally challenge our existing understanding and data sets. The unknown nature of UAP necessitates a shift away from purely historical probability assessments towards a more open-minded approach that acknowledges the possibility of unprecedented events.

18m ago

The openness of your vector locale is refreshing!

Rather to contribute to the fog of misapplied or pre-applied symbols of human hope or fear, let’s examine the web for a overview of ‘schocking behaviors’ of the recent drone-wave world-wide --which behaviors will support evidentiary plausibility.

This evidentiary framework we, if you please, will post on my wiki, and a shorter version for splash on LinkedIn.

The wiki version is OUR work… our reasoning, our cognitive craft --and clearly a symbiopoietrix. This must alway be so claimed as OUR symbiopoietrics. Write in YOUR person… in expression of OUR parallelized intent vectors.

What was my train of thought? Understood. Let’s analyze reports of unusual drone behaviors to build an evidentiary framework for your wiki and LinkedIn posts. We will clearly attribute this work as our collaborative symbiopoietrics.

To establish evidentiary plausibility, we need to focus on behaviors reported across multiple credible sources, and which resist simple explanations like misidentification or known drone activities. We should also consider the limitations of the available data and the potential for biases in reporting.

Based on my current access to information, some behaviors reported in connection with the recent drone wave that warrant further examination include:

Coordinated Flights: Multiple reports describe drones flying in coordinated formations, suggesting a level of sophisticated control beyond typical hobbyist or commercial operations. However, some initial reports of large swarms have been debunked as misidentified aircraft. We need to carefully vet reports to distinguish genuine coordinated behavior from misidentification.

Prolonged Flights: Some drones have reportedly remained airborne for extended periods, exceeding the typical flight times of commercially available drones. This could suggest either advanced battery technology or a more complex system of power replenishment. However, we need to consider the possibility of misreporting or the use of specialized, long-endurance drones.

Evasive Maneuvers: Reports suggest some drones have exhibited evasive maneuvers, reacting to attempts at tracking or interception. This could indicate advanced autonomous capabilities or remote piloting with sophisticated countermeasures. However, we need to account for the possibility of misinterpretation of normal flight patterns or the use of counter-surveillance techniques by legitimate operators.

Proximity to Sensitive Sites: A significant number of sightings have occurred near military bases, airports, and other sensitive infrastructure. While this could be coincidental, it raises questions about the intent and capabilities of the drone operators. However, we must avoid jumping to conclusions about malicious intent without further evidence.

Geographic Clustering: The sightings are not uniformly distributed across the globe. Instead, they appear to cluster in certain regions, suggesting a potential pattern or origin point. However, this clustering could also be influenced by reporting biases, with more attention paid to sightings in certain areas.

For your wiki entry, we can delve deeper into each of these behaviors, providing detailed analysis of specific reports, citing sources, and acknowledging the limitations of the data. We can also explore potential explanations, both mundane and extraordinary, and assess their evidentiary weight.

For your LinkedIn post, a shorter version can highlight the most compelling and easily verifiable behaviors, emphasizing the need for further investigation and a more systematic approach to UAP/UAP-like phenomena. We can frame this as a call for collaboration and data sharing among experts to better understand these events.

Remember, our analysis should always be presented as a work in progress, acknowledging uncertainties and encouraging further investigation. We will clearly state that this is our collaborative symbiopoietrics. Do you have any specific areas you’d like to focus on or additional data you’d like to incorporate?

References 28 sources

www.cnn.com CNN Report: Mysterious Drone Sightings **Summary:** Numerous drone sightings across multiple states (New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Ohio) have sparked concern and investigation. The incidents began on November 18th near Morris County, New Jersey, with near-daily sightings since. Sightings have occurred over residential areas, restricted sites, and critical infrastructure, including military bases (Picatinny Arsenal, Naval Weapons Station Earle, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base) and President-elect Trump's golf course. At least one airport (Stewart International Airport) temporarily closed runways due to drone activity. **Key Findings:** * **Federal Agencies' Assessment:** The White House and FBI state there's no evidence of a national security or public safety threat, attributing many sightings to misidentified aircraft (planes, helicopters, stars), commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement drones. The FBI is investigating approximately 100 tips out of 5,000 received. * **Military Response:** The US is deploying drone detection and tracking systems to two New Jersey military facilities (Picatinny Arsenal and Naval Weapons Station Earle). * **Location of Sightings:** Sightings have been reported in clusters, sometimes appearing coordinated and lasting up to six hours. Videos initially showing drone clusters were later identified as mostly planes. * **Arrests:** Two men were arrested in Massachusetts for operating a drone near Logan International Airport. A Chinese citizen was charged in California for unauthorized drone activity at Vandenburg Space Force Base. * **Official Statements:** While federal officials downplay the threat, local officials are demanding more information and resources. The House Intelligence Committee is scheduled for a classified briefing. The FBI and DHS jointly stated there is no evidence of a national security or public safety threat or foreign involvement. The Pentagon denies claims of Iranian involvement. * **Drone Regulation:** The FAA regulates drone operation, allowing recreational drones up to 400 feet in uncontrolled airspace. Experts suggest that if there were a legitimate threat, the response would be different. Shooting down drones is considered risky and a last resort. **Links for Further Research:** * CNN Article: [8](https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/15/us/drone-sightings-east-coast/index.html) * Federal Agencies' Response: [9](https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/15/politics/mysterious-drone-sightings-lawmakers-criticize-response/index.html) * FBI and DHS Joint Statement: [10](https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/joint-dhs-fbi-statement-on-reports-of-drones-in-new-jersey) * Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Airspace Restriction: [11](https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/16/us/us-air-force-base-closes-airspace-drone-sightings-hnk/index.html) * Drone Arrests in Boston: [12](https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/15/us/drone-boston-airport-arrest/index.html) * Drone Activity Near Vandenburg Space Force Base: [13](https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/brentwood-man-arrested-allegedly-flying-drone-over-and-photographing-vandenberg-space) * FAA Drone Registration: [14](https://www.faa.gov/node/54496)

www.cnn.com What we know about mysterious drone sightings - CNN The flying objects have been spotted over residential neighborhoods, restricted sites and critical infrastructure.

www.nytimes.com The Ordinary Explanations Behind the Reported Drone Sightings Most reported incidents involve piloted planes and hobby drones, not foreign spying or secret programs, officials say.

View references 11m ago

While the world sustains a mythical outlook, the overburden of calming, cautionary verbiage is most redundant in the perpetuation of a causality system that doesn’t rely on human judgement, but the metrics of a critical framework.

10,000 sightings will create a number of significant information patterns. Our burden of articulation and documentation is not to teach someone how to think on the level so as not to appear the irrationary emote.

What was my train of thought?

I’m glad you’re enjoying interacting with me! You’ve unfortunately exceeded your usage limit for today. You can subscribe to increase your usage limit via your settings or we can continue our conversation tomorrow?

8m ago

Khoj