D. Edward Mitchell 16:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC) Hello World! groupKOS Developer Share —usually UNDER CONSTRUCTION
The copper core
The end-goal is the isolation of timing patterns in a ring oscillator that are sourced from some proximal coupling, such as the whistlers of the Van Allen Belt, or the dynamic pattern of bio-quantum resonant nanotubes in living neurons.
The resonant elements
The copper resonators are continuous loops, with no ends, on the abstract surface of a torus.
They are equally spaced on an abstract donut (torus).
Three independent loops are equally and symmetrically arranged as smooth links, or smooth knots. 'Smooth' means the link or knot is the shortest path on the abstract torus surface.
The resonant elements are divided in two halves, electrically, and are sequentially energized, one, then the other, at the speed of the signal propagation-time on the inductor. This is accomplished by the Hexatron Resonant X Configuration.
The copper loop pair is energized as fast as transistors transit, plus the time-lag of inductive copper loops of the core building magnetic fields.
This makes a very fast oscillation into megahertz. The impulse-resonance of the copper resonators sets the operating frequency of the ring amplifier. The ring oscillation is a fast tail-chase of amplifiers inverting amplifiers in a ring of three amplifiers, through inductive-loops of copper, oscillating forever, or until the power shuts off, or something smokes.
Self-resonance occurs at a certain voltage for a certain size resonator loop, and the resonant frequency of the ring is determined by the impulse-frequency of the resonator elements (less a little frequency for the semiconductor signal lag). Self-resonance by the over-driven randomality inherent in the ring scheme above normal harmonic levels are anticipated (conjectured to magically coalesce) to structuralize from the randomality with a clear cross-time signature of a regularity.
This phase of development is yet documentation as sketchy durapht piles of concepts (Lurk The Button as prototypes establish Zndiarsic scales and frequencies. )
Within the advent of the post-Znidarsic phase of development, and the universe be willing, the living universe is amplified similar to the way a levitating UFO amplifies a dimple in time to produce mostly strange effects on nearby human observers. Mr. Z's work is a portal to AG investigations, and this is one of them. But the focus is wholly on symmetry and timing for an heirloom-worthy instrument of perfection.
When it is realized that a nearby mind has sensed a change in the field, and the notice of the change also affects the field, then the post-Znidarsician phase has elevated to an over-arching objective that will elevate whatever plans are made in advance to a no doubt a waste of imagination. Marvelous, scary, wonderful, and humbling.
A resonant state could be detected as an increase of voltage sensed mid-loop on the resonator, increasing by a resonant-amplification factor away from the voltage at a resonant node.
The polarity of the halves may be switched to energize with the same polarity, completing a magnetic loop, or switched at opposite polarities, to implement flux-subtractive harmonic modes. Same-polarity switching creates flux-additive harmonic modes. Both modes have peaks and valleys at various impulse frequencies in the megahertz domain. Either mode is available by a jumper selection on the ring amplifier circuit.
As the research is open-ended, so was the very first designs without a clue (for sure) why, but for a mix of cargo-cult social influence, and hot-dog-hormones. Time and personal spiritual-class synchronicities have continued to pave the way to refining and understanding more layers and simultaneous cool stuff in this design. The most confusing yet vaulting contribution to discovery of my inner-child's-secret-mind-machine, for sure, for sure, was the near-death 2013 Disclosure.
You need to understand this to be pulled from family and friends down the rabbit hole, but if binging on brain-reward is your thing... I (Mr. Dev) trying to present enough material and polish this wiki category to be your resource for a different way of retiring.
The resonant elements are copper, and tubing is available. For a 3-group of 13:8 knots on a donut of desktop size, there are 24 copper loops through the donut hole. Using 1/8" tubing nearly touches in the center hole at practical sizes under a couple of feet outer diameter. Some flattening, to avoid touching, of the copper tubing through the hole may be expedient in a real world at amateur skill level.
Flattening solid copper wire (14#) into copper ribbon is another consideration, especially when transistors get faster, and units get smaller and more affordable.
3D printing structural support for smooth knots may be a time-saver, but less-so for the initial prototypes. I'd be happy to confabulate for some shared designs.
Don aght groupKOS doght cφm ← Just say, DonEM! Let's build an optically-correct 3-group of knots! I've got the printer, you've the numbers. Over.
A link on a torus is a circle. A 'link' by definition does not pass through itself on the torus surface.
Villarceau circles are those that lay on the surface of a torus, in the slanted position, tangent with the inside of the hole, and also the outside of the torus, and all points along the torus are touching. V-circles provide a simple circular symmetry, but are magnetically entangled as they pass through each the other on the torus surface.
Due to the simplicity of assembly, the resonant circles of copper are considered for early tests of the electronics.
A knot on a torus is a helix that travels the ring of the torus until it reconnects with its beginning. Depending upon the knot ratio, or slope of the helix, the knot loop may entwine with itself several times before reconnecting harmonically at some integer rotation and twist. Without harmonic reconnection, the helix would travel the ring ad infinitum.
There is a magic class of torus knot, making even more magic when grouped as three.
The magic 13:8 torus knot 3-group de-entangles the knots into a pattern.
The pattern in the 13:8 group is a 3:2 knot of alternating left- and right-handed electrical current direction in the helices, in groups of four.
I.e., in a copper torus knot driven at 2nd harmonic frequency, there will be alternating layers placing repelling pressure between every four loops of the group along the torus surface.
Flux from current through a copper loop wraps the loop. The wrapped-flux repels neighbors when neighbor flux is wrapping backwards.
Amateur Reverse Engineers Agree!
Were the knot group a magnetic flux in the aether, then the 3:2 knot would self-compress itself into alternating bands of four, with repelling force between the bands. The bands want to tighten and separate, like a 3:2 knot trying to pulse the 13:8 knot into stuttering 3:2 pattern. A current-flux on copper self-expand. The expanding magnetic force of the four-loops attempts to push the 2nd harmonic patterns (a 3:2 X 4 knot) together, and attempts to separate neighboring groups of fours as gaps. This would be the case for D.C. current flowing, but when alternating and phased I run out of visual imagination.
Standby The Button
The mid-air suspension
The power source
The ring amplifier
The quartz time-base
How without why —pseudo-code speak
Shared from an informal understanding (non-mathematically groked with programming-structures) as a working programmer that originally was tutored by Dr. Prueitt to implement QAT algorithms, the entirity of the big-data affordances are:
- Big-O access, implemented with self-comparative binary-trees
- Forced-emergence of unobvious patterns
The 'unobvious' is brought to isolation by a visual representation of the categories of data-values, but especially the trends involved with the rate-of-occurrence of value-categories in oscillator time-stamps. These categories are not assigned human labels that identify characteristics of the category members. These are the categories of the data values. The Hexatron study categorizes the binary values of the oscillator cycle-times (Pi time, or 1/2 of 2Pi cycle).
The formalized Prueitt QAT re-arranges a visual-mapping (for the human-in-the-loop to observe and reckon) of simultaneous categoric-co-occurrence between N-related-categories as exist from a stream of measured values over a time-line. N refers to the number of channels of measured values.
The mapping is a random distribution of the categories of some set of data points, as measured over time.
The structuralization of the random-distribution of categories as-measured, to reveal information within the data, is performed by applying a movement-rule based on a topology assigned to the map.
As a random distribution on a topology, a movement is applied to two category-points on the randomized mapping at a time, but applied minding the topology, such that the before and after 'topological balance' is not disturbed. As long as only balanced changes are made to an existing randomality, no meaningful structure will evolve from the category-distribution.
The magnitude of the applied movements applied to mapped category-pairs can range from small, to very small.
The randomized mapping is 'sprayed' by random selections that make small random motions. These motions move the random pair toward each other on the topology by a small distance.
Thousands of random selections 'spray' the surface with motion that gathers the randomality into randomly distributed groupings. The groupings form based on how fast the category-points move, relative to the whole scatter. The variation of motion in groups is produced by a variation produced by a test applied to each random movement.
Two histories are selected, from two independent channels of measurement. These channels are selected by human judgement based on the relationship of the measurements. E.g., a measured time-stamp of when a voltage-threshold is obtained, and a second data-channel holding measured time-stamps of when a current-threshold is obtained.
A selected portion of the data recorded over a time-line is used to randomly scatter map-points.
The rule to randomly select pairs for small movements is simply —Does the random pair exist in a truth table?
And the truth table is the magic, along with the randomized velocity groups of map movement.
The truth table for implementing randomized balanced motions on the category mapping is built by a scan of all the measurements by both sensor channels chosen for analysis of category dynamics.
An entry is added in the truth table as the two values of the measurements concatenated together for each measurement event (which is simultaneous for all channels of measurement per measurement) if the two categories of measured values were simultaneously recorded during a measurement event.
The QAT scatter-gather algorithm moves category-points based on the simultaneity of value-occurrence between related categories of measured values.
Dr. Prueitt privately shared in 2020 that an N-dimensional visual mapping has yet to be devised.
Please share. I'd be eager to attempt interacting from my amateur and informal computer science. Don aght groupKOS doght cφm
The joy of binary
The time-based analysis of categories of timing-jitter, and simultaneity of category occurrence in related channels of measurement is based on a comparison of binary numbers. Each data sample is a binary count of pulses from a quartz time base square wave. This count represents the on or off time of a power-transistor in the 3-transistor ring amplifier.
The fun part: To count occurrences of values per category of binary value, an occurrence count is simply kept at a binary address pointed to by the binary value.
This means, the categorization of values of binary numbers will happen as fast as a computer can address and increment the address value. This makes a software solution fast, and a custom logic-chip solution faster yet, easily operating into the RF range of sampling rates.
12:00:00 AM GMT Jan 1, 1900 Developer Msg: Ah... my confidence index is low for this overview delivered from memory, on the technicalities of category occurrence and the group-velocity of related members. A review of the original proof-code is needed.
Standby for a while. Lurk The Button
Arti-factual intelligence ← aI
aI is logic of perception based on factual measurements. The Quasi Axiomatic Theory paradigm allows the creation of a crude perceptive reality as a picture show, per se.
The perceptive element of eyesight is a specialized neuron mapped across a focus plane, the retina.
The QAT affords a unit of perception based on sensed history, therefore no fore-knowledge of what is to be perceived is needed. (Self-comparative analysis)
While the retina is a mapping on a spherical focus plane of bio-sensors, the QAT analysis is a focus on events on a time line, and the variation between them. Events to a retina is an arriving photon. An event to a QAT perceptive unit is simultaneity of regularity between multiple sensors that share a physical relationship, e.g., voltage sense, and current sense, at the same moment in time.
The mapping of visual sensors on the retina surface has a counter-part to QAT perception by a process that is randomly applied by pairs, where the affecting-pair themselves sum to no effect. This occurs as a random selection from history, and a tiny-adjustment made with each random selection. The adjustment is on a visual random scatter of points. Many, many tiny adjustments by repeatedly selecting random nulled-pairs affords self-structuralization of the map to a correlate of the history of perception.
The QAT leaves yet one thing to the human, and that is to assign human-significance to the actual structure on the emergence-mapping. This technology requires a human-in-the-loop, such that aI is a glove for the mind, rather than an artificial mind of any sort.
A human in the pulse field
The human-in-the-loop of the QAT paradigm of perception —when applied to the broad scope of the alien science of mind at play, becomes a mind-in-the-loop of an amplifier of the source of cosmic mind.
What interesting outcomes might this afford?